University faculty ranks and types are defined in FSH 1565-D. All university faculty have an annual performance evaluation, FSH 3320. Annual performance evaluations are part of the packet used by review committees when considering progress towards promotion (FSH 3560) and/or tenure (FSH 3520). The Calendar for U of I Faculty Processes establishes the timelines and identifies deadlines for submission of documents to the Provost’s Office.
Evaluation of the performance of each faculty member is, primarily, the responsibility of the faculty member and his/her unit administrator and is based on the expectations identified in the position description for the corresponding year. Annual evaluations are among the critical materials used by review committees when considering progress toward promotion () and tenure (). The 2018 Annual Evaluation of Faculty Form is found at the bottom of the policy page. The completed, signed Disclosure of Conflicts section must be submitted with the annual evaluation each year.
Personnel on international assignment see ().
The appointment and responsibilities of Administrators are defined in . The Office of the Dean coordinates the annual evaluation and is delegated the responsibility for the periodic review processes for their college.
Annual Evaluation of Administrators by Faculty Members : Opportunity is provided for an annual performance evaluation of assistant and associate deans, and administrators of academic departments and other intracollege units by the faculty members of their respective units.
Periodic Review of Administrators : Each assistant and associate dean, and administrator of academic departments and other intracollege units is formally reviewed at least six months before the end of each appointment term, or, if there is not a fixed appointment term, at least every five years. College and/or Unit bylaws may provide for additional guidance within this process.
The appointment and responsibilities of Administrators are defined in . Senior administrators are expected to perform satisfactorily in employing strategies and implementing objectives to achieve the goals of the University strategic action plan. The Office of the Provost and Executive Vice President coordinates the following evaluation processes.
Provost Direct Reports Annual Evaluation : annual performance appraisals provide an opportunity to acknowledge accomplishments and to provide a process for continuous professional development. This annual review template should be used by direct reports of the Provost/EVP.
Annual Evaluation of Senior Administrators by Faculty Members : Opportunity is provided for annual evaluation of the administrative performance of deans and center executives by the faculty members in their respective units.
Periodic Review of Senior Administrators : Each direct report of the Provost and Executive Vice President is formally reviewed at least six months before the end of each appointment term, or, if there is not a fixed appointment term, at least every five years. This guideline and review template have been established to conduct the review process.