NSF Data Management Plan
The information here is meant to assist PIs in developing a Data Management Plan, as required by NSF. Much of the information provided is directly from the NSF Policy & Awards Policies and Procedures Guide.
The National Science Foundation now requires all proposals to include plans for data management and sharing of the products of research. Please note that a valid Data Management Plan may include only the statement that no detailed plan is needed, as long as the statement is accompanied by a clear justification. FastLane will not permit submission of a proposal that is missing a Data Management Plan. The Data Management Plan will be reviewed as part of the intellectual merit or broader impacts of the proposal, or both, as appropriate.
The Data Management Plan is submitted as a supplementary document of no more than two pages labeled “Data Management Plan”. The Grant Proposal Guide states that this supplement should describe how the proposal will conform to NSF policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results and may include:
- Name of the person(s) responsible for data management within your research project;
- The types of data, samples, physical collections, software, curriculum materials, and other materials to be produced in the course of the project;
- The standards to be used for data and metadata format and content (where existing standards are absent or deemed inadequate, this should be documented along with any proposed solutions or remedies);
- Policies for access and sharing, including provisions for appropriate protection of privacy, confidentiality, security, intellectual property, or other rights or requirements;
- Policies and provisions for re-use, re-distribution, and the production of derivatives;
- Plans for archiving data, samples, and other research products, and for preservation of access to them;
- Period of data retention.
Research data are formally defined as “the recorded factual material commonly accepted in the scientific community as necessary to validate research findings” by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1999).
The basic level of digital data to be archived and made available includes:
- Analyzed data, and
- The metadata that define how these data were generated.
These are data that are or that should be published in theses, dissertations, refereed journal articles, supplemental data attachments for manuscripts, books and book chapters, and other print or electronic publication formats.
- Analyzed data are (but are not restricted to) digital information that would be published, including digital images, published tables and tables of the numbers used for making published graphs.
- Necessary metadata are (but are not restricted to) descriptions or suitable citations of experiments, apparatuses, raw materials, computational codes and computer-calculation input conditions.
The Office of Management and Budget statement (1999) specifies that this definition does not include “preliminary analyses, drafts of scientific papers, plans for future research, peer reviews or communications with colleagues.” Raw data fall into this category as “preliminary analyses.”
PIs should check for data management requirements and plans specific to the Directorate, Office, Division, Program or other NSF unit. These are available at:. If guidance specific to the program is not available, then the requirements described in the Grant Proposal Guide (above) apply.
The University of Idaho Library strives to help researchers at the University of Idaho become familiar with data management practices. Library faculty endeavor to communicate information about data storage standards and protocols, metadata reporting requirements and best practices, and the requirements and recommendations of national funding bodies and/or professional associations.
Google "NSF data management plan example" to find additional resources and examples.
(Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research)